|
|
|
| Non-WTF Job: C++ Developer at Good Grievance (Ronkonkoma, NY) |
| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Next » |
|
Wait this is a news site? When did that happen?
|
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:16
•
by
Luk
(unregistered)
|
|
What X sites? Gimme URL's!!
|
|
an ex of mine got fired for looking at pr0n at work.. they printed off every single page he'd visited and handed it to him, about 2 kg's worth of paper. whoops.
|
So his employer printed out 2kg of porn and gave him a copy? That's into WTF?! territory right there. |
|
What's "distant learning"?
|
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:31
•
by
biziclop
(unregistered)
|
Apparently how to have sex without anyone else about. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:31
•
by
Dirk
(unregistered)
|
Is that 2kg of printed URLs? Just interested... |
|
Dear Jesus Christ. Sucks to be him.
|
|
Wait, what? A happy ending to a DailyWTF story?
Have I fallen into some strange alternate universe or something? |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:39
•
by
German
(unregistered)
|
What sucks about being Jesus Christ? |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:41
•
by
Employee at a Major Metropolitan University
(unregistered)
|
|
I assume by "distant learning," he means "distance learning" (i.e., taking online classes). I had to maintain an app that allowed students to get their student ID Cards mailed to them. Fortunately I handed that responsibility off to someone else.
captcha: duis |
|
You know, when the xxx system uses the xxx interface to the xxx dohickey located at the xxx offices...
Uh oh... |
Lots of them have had "happy endings." And people act like it's never happened before every time... |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:46
•
by
Bob
(unregistered)
|
|
I think you must have missed the end of that story.
|
sure, send me your address and i'll email them to you.. just kidding. they actually visited each page and printed it |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:47
•
by
Anonymous
(unregistered)
|
No. A DailyWTF story about a "happy ending". |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:48
•
by
ContraCorners
(unregistered)
|
|
Well there was that whole "painful death at a young age" thing. Perhpas you've read about it?
|
I am going with the tortuous activity that is crucifixion. |
Getting crucified. You weren't paying attention in church, were you? |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:50
•
by
ContraCorners
(unregistered)
|
Shoot! Forgot to quote what I was responding to... Well, there was that whole "painful death at a young age" thing etc. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 09:58
•
by
Redbeard
(unregistered)
|
They were just using that as an excuse to visit the pr0n sites at work too... |
|
Pssh. When your sales guy runs up a $10K/month tab on a company credit card because he's dating a stripper, then you can complain. TRWTF is that this went on for about a year before he was let go.
|
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:17
•
by
conventio
(unregistered)
|
Was the person who visited then printed the material let go too? As they has just committed the exact same offense... |
|
So, I am gonna tell you, where the wtf is. No one here complained, that a company is logging the activity of their employees over four months!
|
|
this is the WTF on the day this story broke.....?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7379742.stm this dude kept his job!! |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:29
•
by
K.D.
(unregistered)
|
That happens everywhere - they log your phone calls and email too. I once worked with a gal who had a stack of phone numbers and emails handed to her and was asked to explain. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:35
•
by
Mate
(unregistered)
|
|
Over here, in Finland, it's strictly illegal for an employer to draw the line between an employee and the sites he or she accesses. The employer can log the web traffic, but can not tell a single person not to surf pr0n sites.
|
Could be worse. You could be stabbed. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:46
•
by
Erik
(unregistered)
|
You fool, he wasn't saying it sucks to be Jesus Christ. He was addressing his comment to Jesus Christ, like this: Dear Jesus Christ, Sucks to be him. BTW, nice job on the water to wine thing, yah? You must rock at parties. Keep it real, JC. Peace out! Z3R0 |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:53
•
by
Global Warmer
(unregistered)
|
With 2kg of printed porn I am sure there were lots of happy endings. That's why the guy was let go. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:54
•
by
Phil
(unregistered)
|
|
Weirdo :-)
|
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:56
•
by
Walleye
(unregistered)
|
Plus there are all those millions of wackos who want to ask you for favours every day! It's worse than being on helpdesk! |
|
I'm sure I've read this story, or one almost identical to it, before on TDWTF.
|
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:58
•
by
Frank
(unregistered)
|
In the US an employer not only is allowed to monitor and record all traffic and tie it to the employee, they have no responsibility to let employees know that they are doing this. It is safe to assume that most jobs where you have a computer at your desk in the US that they are monitoring what you are doing. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:58
•
by
Michael
(unregistered)
|
That's the good thing about working on IT: YOU can visit porn sites all day, and if someone asks you about it, you can just say that you're checking access logs to find possible security breaches. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 10:59
•
by
Anon Fred
(unregistered)
|
Also, the employer probably isn't liable for creating a "hostile working environment" when Michael spends all day watching horsegag.avi. |
|
wow! a happy ending!
|
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 11:06
•
by
Tommy American
(unregistered)
|
"horsegag.avi" ewwwww |
|
Ya. most companies in the US monitor.
I was actually fired from a job for discovering the monitoring software and telling other employees about it. |
Unless you're the IT guy responsible for the logs, and know that logging has been shut down because the company is too cheap to pay for the software! Not that I'm complaining. |
|
I've got it: the Real WTF is that in all that time, Michael never managed to figure out which sites were relatively safe for his "interests" and wouldn't give you viruses. Right?
Or maybe the Real WTF is that Michael relied on web sites instead of BitTorrent to indulge his interests. Yeah, that's it. |
The real WTF is that they didn't take the printouts, put them on a wooden table, take a photo of them, scan the photo, and email it to the ex. |
|
TRWTF is IE.
A less-exploitable browser would allow problem-free porn browsing. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 11:45
•
by
Anonymous
(unregistered)
|
Yep you have or at least I have too. Come on TDWTF I want new articles to keep me busy so I don't have to work. captcha: damnum - kinda goes along with the Jesus talk. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 11:49
•
by
SomeCoder
(unregistered)
|
That's sort of true but the real WTF is the user. The best web browser in the world won't stop a user from saying "Oooh hotnakedgirls.exe!! *double clicks*" |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 12:02
•
by
Pat
(unregistered)
|
|
[quote user="Erik]
You fool, he wasn't saying it sucks to be Jesus Christ. He was addressing his comment to Jesus Christ, like this: Dear Jesus Christ, Sucks to be him. BTW, nice job on the water to wine thing, yah? You must rock at parties. Keep it real, JC. Peace out! Z3R0 [/quote] Wow, good thing we have you here to point out the obvious and make that nice whooshing sound. |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 12:09
•
by
Schnapple
(unregistered)
|
Err.. because they wanted to catch someone? Seems to me that if you had just saved them the bandwidth of porn and told their employees to get back to work for them that they would, I don't know, not fired you for that. |
Ditto ;) |
xxx.lanl.gov, that's some real pr0n. WRT Finland, are they allowed to have a company meeting and say generally not to look at pr0n? And say, for example, "not to anyone in particular" while glaring at an individual? Cuz that would be funny. (BBCode sucks) |
Re: The Problem Child
2008-05-02 12:25
•
by
Enterpriser
(unregistered)
|
|
[quote username="Schnapple"] Err.. because they wanted to catch someone? Seems to me that if you had just saved them the bandwidth of porn and told their employees to get back to work for them that they would, I don't know, not fired you for that.[/quote]
You might be suprised to find out that they didn't want to catch someone. They in fact wanted to discourage people from doing the wrong thing in the first place. If someone making employees aware that they are being monitored will lead to employees not doing the wrong thing, then surely the goal has been met and all should be happy. |
| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Next » |