Comment On Status, Please

“Just give me a damn status!” growled Murray, the aging IT project manager who everyone thought would have been retired by now. In fairness, the fifty-nine year old’s job performance hadn’t waned one bit through his decades-long tenure at Bell Labs. In fact, some would even say that in his later years, he traded some of his trademarked ferocity for geniality. “Dammit,” Murry barked two seconds later at Tom Limoncelli, one of the developers sitting around the conference table, “I don’t have all day! Give me a status!” [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:01 • by JamesQMurphy
FRIST!

Think I'll kick back and enjoy me a nice status...

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:07 • by The Sussman (unregistered)
I'd love a good algorithmic glow job.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:13 • by dkf
Rabid packs of wolves with firearms and laserguns FTW!

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:14 • by snoofle
Ok, everyone here thinks I'm nuts because I just busted out laughing, and can't really describe (at least not out loud) why...

THanks, I needed that!

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:20 • by Code Dependent
Another story about spineless wimps.

"Murray, I don't respond to your favorite motivator--intimidation. You need to use something else. Lower your voice when you speak to me, and speak in tones that convey respect. Then you'll get your status."

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:20 • by Cro (unregistered)
Reminds me of a particular contractor we had. He was, honestly, the most boring speaker you'd heard. He never finished a sentance, simply choosing "uuuuuum", "eeeeer" or even "aaaaaaand" to elongate a sentance to... well every thing he ever said. This coupled with daily up date meeting, and while everyone elses update was between 10 and 30 seconds, his would last over 5 minutes.

Everyone would switch off completely... it was a total embarrassment... so I invented a game. Everybody took a sweepstake on the number of "um"'s that he'd say, before the meeting. I'd be offical judicator (you have to be careful as "er"'s and "and"'s don't count) and suddenly, we had an incredibly attentive set of staff in meetings! Despite everyone getting excited before and after meetings, the inevitable arguments as to the number of "um"'s he said - he never actually noticed.

Captcha : Facilisis - dunno why, but it sounds rude!

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:24 • by skin256 (unregistered)
Hope they paid really really well to sit through a tirade like that.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:30 • by grumpy (unregistered)
This just sounds so juvenile.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:32 • by phleabo (unregistered)
Eh, Murry doesn't sound so bad. I've dealt with far worse.

They're easy to deal with, too. Let them get into a rant, then about halfway through, interrupt them and mention that you were thinking about something else, and could they please repeat that last part about whatever it was? Polite and chipper drives them to strokes.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:41 • by Just Turned 60 (unregistered)
59 is not retirement age, for Pete's sake.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:41 • by obediah
I really want to lambaste this as the absolute worst, most off-topic post ever on thedailtywtf.

But the posting itself is a meta-WTF, and while not particularly curious - it certainly is a perversion of IT. So I guess it will have to skate by on solely the worst post ever.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:45 • by snoofle
You: You want a status?
Murray: I think I'm entitled to a status
Y: You want a Status?
M: I want the Status!
Y: You can't handle the status! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to guarded by men who give status. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Murray? ...
M: Did you give the status?
Y: I gave the status you sent me to give
M: Did you give the status?
Y: You're goddamn right I did!!

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:45 • by Flatline
228509 in reply to 228504
obediah:
I really want to lambaste this as the absolute worst, most off-topic post ever on thedailtywtf.

But the posting itself is a meta-WTF, and while not particularly curious - it certainly is a perversion of IT. So I guess it will have to skate by on solely the worst post ever.


Eh? The most off-topic post ever? You've not spent much time here then, obviously. And how, pray tell, is it off-topic anyway? It's a post about an IT Manager and his long-suffering team. Seems perfect for here perfectly honest.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 11:54 • by lulzy (unregistered)
I know, let's replace EVERY word with blow job. Now it'll be REALLY funny. Durr hurr durr.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:00 • by xxx (unregistered)
Hehe. I laught all the way to kindergarten.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:01 • by snoofle
228514 in reply to 228513
xxx:
Hehe. I laught all the way to kindergarten.

What the hell kind of kindergarten do you go to that bj's are discussed/given/received?

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:04 • by Chris Hansen (unregistered)
228515 in reply to 228514
snoofle:
xxx:
Hehe. I laught all the way to kindergarten.

What the hell kind of kindergarten do you go to that bj's are discussed/given/received?


Why don't you have a seat over there?

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:06 • by obediah
228516 in reply to 228509
Flatline:
obediah:
I really want to lambaste this as the absolute worst, most off-topic post ever on thedailtywtf.

But the posting itself is a meta-WTF, and while not particularly curious - it certainly is a perversion of IT. So I guess it will have to skate by on solely the worst post ever.


Eh? The most off-topic post ever? You've not spent much time here then, obviously.


I've seen a lot of posts I would consider off-topic ( and have been curmudgeoning up the comments about the dumbing down of thedailyWTF since before you joined ), but I don't remember anything worse than "it's funny to pretend like your boss is talking about sex".

And how, pray tell, is it off-topic anyway?


It wasn't a long comment, you should have read the whole thing. I didn't say it was off-topic, on the contrary I explicitly stated how it was on-topic.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:23 • by Spell check (unregistered)
Murray is spelled Murry one time. See if you can find it.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:25 • by sadwings (unregistered)
“Dammit,” Murry barked two seconds later at Tom Limoncelli, one of the developers sitting around the conference table, “I don’t have all day! Give me a status!”

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:26 • by mjk340
228521 in reply to 228515
Are those brownies? Yum.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:27 • by kswanton
228522 in reply to 228503
Just Turned 60:
59 is not retirement age, for Pete's sake.


Ya, in this economy it’s more like 85.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:34 • by Charles400
Ohhhh... So that is why Ford always brings a towel to status meetings.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:35 • by frustrati (unregistered)
Hee hee... I imagined that he said "blow-job". How naughty.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:49 • by Crash Magnet (unregistered)
"Status" is used 21 times in that article.

Crash Magnet

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:53 • by dtech
228527 in reply to 228491
snoofle:
Ok, everyone here thinks I'm nuts because I just busted out laughing, and can't really describe (at least not out loud) why...

THanks, I needed that!


Maybe you need to get yourself some status.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 12:54 • by operagost
Kindergarten rocks.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:20 • by Lustig (unregistered)
I'm sick of being asked for the status.

Do you want the status? Well, the status is snafu.
Now, get lost!

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:22 • by Yanman.be (unregistered)
Any girls want to give me a status?

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:23 • by yyy (unregistered)
228532 in reply to 228513
xxx:
Hehe. I laught all the way to kindergarten.


Kindergarten... yes, that might explain your spelling.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:27 • by Steve (unregistered)
I can haz status?

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:29 • by flaggy (unregistered)
228534 in reply to 228494
Code Dependent:
Another story about spineless wimps.

"Murray, I don't respond to your favorite motivator--intimidation. You need to use something else. Lower your voice when you speak to me, and speak in tones that convey respect. Then you'll get your status."

Then Murray speaks softly and you get down to your knees.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:32 • by SomeCoder (unregistered)
228537 in reply to 228494
Code Dependent:
Another story about spineless wimps.

"Murray, I don't respond to your favorite motivator--intimidation. You need to use something else. Lower your voice when you speak to me, and speak in tones that convey respect. Then you'll get your status."


I don't know if it's spineless wimps really. What is the proper way to handle this situation?

I usually fight back, HARD when confronted with someone like this. It's not the best idea, but it's just my natural reaction to someone that thinks fear is a motivator.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:32 • by wee
Tom's a bisexual activist. I don't know what to think about that in the context of Chris's mental regex.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:32 • by flaggy (unregistered)
228539 in reply to 228519
Spell check:
Murray is spelled Murry one time. See if you can find it.

For extra fun, replace Murray with buttsex.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:53 • by Code Dependent
228540 in reply to 228537
SomeCoder:
Code Dependent:
Another story about spineless wimps.

"Murray, I don't respond to your favorite motivator--intimidation. You need to use something else. Lower your voice when you speak to me, and speak in tones that convey respect. Then you'll get your status."
I don't know if it's spineless wimps really. What is the proper way to handle this situation?

I usually fight back, HARD when confronted with someone like this. It's not the best idea, but it's just my natural reaction to someone that thinks fear is a motivator.
There, you pointed out the problem with that: it's a "natural reaction". He's provoking a reaction in you with his behavior... one that he no doubt has anticipated ("they'll either get scared or get mad," he thinks).

I prefer to adjust his behavior pattern by informing him verbally, and backing my words up with my actions, that his behavior will not produce the reaction he wants from me.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 13:55 • by SomeCoder (unregistered)
228541 in reply to 228540
Code Dependent:
SomeCoder:
Code Dependent:
Another story about spineless wimps.

"Murray, I don't respond to your favorite motivator--intimidation. You need to use something else. Lower your voice when you speak to me, and speak in tones that convey respect. Then you'll get your status."
I don't know if it's spineless wimps really. What is the proper way to handle this situation?

I usually fight back, HARD when confronted with someone like this. It's not the best idea, but it's just my natural reaction to someone that thinks fear is a motivator.
There, you pointed out the problem with that: it's a "natural reaction". He's provoking a reaction in you with his behavior... one that he no doubt has anticipated ("they'll either get scared or get mad," he thinks).

I prefer to adjust his behavior pattern by informing him verbally, and backing my words up with my actions, that his behavior will not produce the reaction he wants from me.


Hey, I know that's not the best reaction. It's just how I react. And it tends to get the job done though - obviously - in a non-optimal way *shrug*

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 14:04 • by akatherder
I'm married so I'm status-exempt.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 14:05 • by Mark (unregistered)
Any regular get-together is somewhat suspect as likely to have a ceremonial purpose rather than a focused goal of consensus. The weekly status meeting is an obvious example. Though its goal may seem to be status reporting, its real intent is status confirming. And it's not the status of the work, but the status of the boss.


-- DeMarco & Lister, Peopleware

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 14:17 • by OhDear (unregistered)
Status my salad!

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 15:23 • by snoofle
228561 in reply to 228527
dtech:
snoofle:
Ok, everyone here thinks I'm nuts because I just busted out laughing, and can't really describe (at least not out loud) why...

THanks, I needed that!


Maybe you need to get yourself some status.
I'm married - my life is without status.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 15:27 • by gilhad (unregistered)
lol, i would give him bored look, roll 10-sided dice two times, pretend to read the value on iy and then say "53%" (or any other current value, preferably NOT divisible by ten).

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 15:41 • by Quagmire (unregistered)
Giggidy!

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 15:41 • by sf (unregistered)
228564 in reply to 228508
snoofle:
You: You want a blow job?
Murray: I think I'm entitled to a blow job
Y: You want a blow job?
M: I want the blow job!
Y: You can't handle the blow job! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to guarded by men who give blow jobs. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Murray? ...
M: Did you give the blow job?
Y: I gave the blow job you sent me to give
M: Did you give the blow job?
Y: You're goddamn right I did!!

FTFU

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 15:42 • by darkmage0707077 (unregistered)
228565 in reply to 228514
snoofle:
xxx:
Hehe. I laught all the way to kindergarten.

What the hell kind of kindergarten do you go to that bj's are discussed/given/received?


One in the Deep South of the USA, perhaps...?

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 15:51 • by Mogri (unregistered)
228566 in reply to 228564
sf:
snoofle:
You: You want a blow job?
Murray: I think I'm entitled to a blow job
Y: You want a blow job?
M: I want the blow job!
Y: You can't handle the blow job! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to guarded by men who give blow jobs. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Murray? ...
M: Did you give the blow job?
Y: I gave the blow job you sent me to give
M: Did you give the blow job?
Y: You're goddamn right I did!!

FTFU


Subtlety is lost on you.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 16:31 • by Zylon
228571 in reply to 228537
SomeCoder:
I usually fight back, HARD when confronted with someone like this. It's not the best idea, but it's just my natural reaction to someone that thinks fear is a motivator.

If your natural reaction was to get your work done on time, this situation wouldn't come up in the first place.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 16:57 • by Dr_Barnowl (unregistered)
228574 in reply to 228571
If your natural reaction was to get your work done on time, this situation wouldn't come up in the first place.


People who use this style of management, in my experience, will find an excuse to apply pressure like this. They will raise the bar until someone can't reach it, just so they have someone to shout at. If the others can smell the fear, they'll be motivated.

Here's a pack of rabid dogs on motorbikes

2008-11-11 17:25 • by hawkse (unregistered)
I bet there might even be some guns in there as well.

Re: Status, Please

2008-11-11 17:30 • by ChiefCrazyTalk (unregistered)
228582 in reply to 228486
The real WTF? That the developers didn't know their status, and were late reporting it.

Signed,

A PM
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Add Comment