| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Next » |
|
id commit suicide if my company was like that. Thats awful.
oh first? :) |
|
First!
And wow, don't you love "the process". :The Process": Preventing anything productive from being done since the dawn of man. |
|
This isn't bureaucracy so much as idiotic slavery to process. Real hardcore bureaucracy would have required someone from the State's central IT office to set up the printer, in person, on a wooden table.
|
|
Silly me, I thought processes were originally developed to maximize productivity.
|
|
Not exactly. Processes usually hinder productivity, and this is not only true in IT but every sector. I'd be much more productive in house building if I didn't need an architect or any permits in order to do so.
Processes provide accountability, which for a big company is important. Unfortunately, some processes have been built so that no one person can be held accountable (and this is on purpose), and so the fault lies with the process itself. The process, not being a sentient being but rather an intangible noun, gets complained about, but no one using the process ever gets in trouble. |
|
Wait. Clicking Ignore completed the installation?
I didn't see a Cancel button on that form. Did they shut down the computer in the middle of the installation without canceling out first? |
Well there's your problem. Jessica clearly said to use commas, not periods. Maybe next time you should use XML. |
|
We are an IT Consulting company that contracts with a state run rehab clinic. One day I watched them spend $30k on a teleconferencing setup because they had grant money from the state that they had to spend by 5:00 PM. They never use the damn thing. Doesn't have much to do with the story above but watching them waste my tax dollars in real time was a new experience.
|
|
The joy of accountability. Jessica needed to keep her call volumes up. Going around the system would've lowered her numbers and perhaps cost her a cushy job.
The real WTF was Ben not knowing how to place a call on the phone system used by his employer. |
|
I pretty much function as technical support for my team, setting up things like start menu shortcuts and icons. I have even written some useful programs that I gave to the corporate support group. You get better response from them if they know they owe you for giving them free programs.
I have heard NO complaints from them, so I am very pleased with a rate of zero defects. Every time I ask my friend in tech support how they are working out, he gets a big smile and says they are working perfectly. Here are some examples of programs I have written for our technical support group: ud.exe - this goes up a directory, so instead of typing "cd.." you can simply type "ud" ud2.exe - this goes up TWO directories at once, so it is like doing ud twice. ud3.exe - this goes up THREE directories at once (you get the picture by now I hope). mkdirrandom.exe - makes a new directory with a random name, using a random number generator I wrote (I adapted the code someone posted on this site). regall.exe - this recursively searches your hard drive for all DLLs and runs regsvr32.exe on each one so everything will work again if a DLL registration gets messed up. backupall.exe - this backs up all exes, dlls, ocxs, and tmp files in case you need to restore your computer. It puts them in a folder called C:\backupall. |
|
Oh man, this pales in comparison to some of the crap at the FEDERAL government!
Plus this whole remoting in from a cube 5 feet away reminds me of when I worked a contract gig (non-government). Everyone there was encouraged to use IM to "facilitate communication on critical projects". Never mind the fact that everyone used public IM (yahoo, AIM, etc) and unencrypted to boot. TRWTF was the fact that a simple IM message was sent over 1500 miles (my guess) just to go about 3 feet. |
|
*runs screaming in terror*
(and I'm even in IT) |
|
I like using IM at work. Unlike a "meeting" people can respond in their own time if they're busy, it's less disturbing to the work environment than a casual conversation, and you have a record of the conversation. All-in-all, an instant message system is a great business tool.
|
TRWTF is that she was right next to him when he was talking to her over the phone, How is that possible without hearing the delay that occurs when using phones? He should have realised it was her straight away. |
|
By a happy coincidence:
http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/ Good for 25th September 2008 only, of course, otherwise it should be in their archive, but the way that's presented is a bit WTF'y in itself. |
|
Obligatory:
Comment goes here after filling out form 211-B.* * Please request form 211-B by calling 774-6216 on an outside line. (For instructions on how to reach an outside line, please refer to page 37 in your communications manual. If you do not have a communications manual, please request one by filling out form 912-C. Form 912-C can be requested from by calling 774-1234 on an outside line) Captcha : "sino" ("Bell" in Portuguese) |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 10:23
•
by
Tephlon
(unregistered)
|
|
Direct link: http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/default.aspx?id=433e53e1-26bd-413b-9bfb-e8948e8fd517
(Go back one day and then forward one day..., Silly, I know.) |
|
ok. my brain just exploded...
|
If this happened to me, I would kill Jessica. By strangling her. With my bare hands. No jury of my peers would convict me.* *E.g., Truckules, Swiss Missery, Fee Waybil of The Tubes, ... |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 10:34
•
by
DaveAronson
|
Have you tried.JavaScript? |
|
Oh great...774-2612...that's one digit off from dialing the local help desk here at work.
And yes...you can dial 8 first to dial internally. |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 10:38
•
by
SHMUK
(unregistered)
|
|
@adam: But IM is incredibly disturbing if you bill by the hour.
I politely refused to join the IM-network at my current location, because it would kill my productivity. While coding, I don't even run email-notifications in the background, just to keep concentrated. Just checking for it manually if its fine for me myself. I observe the disruption of my coworkers concentration every day. I could not afford that. |
|
serious fricken bureaucracy is not more than three word
|
|
The real tragedy is that the process works.
|
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 10:45
•
by
vman
(unregistered)
|
If you don't play Paranoia, you should...that's almost *exactly* the type of thing you'd see in alpha complex. |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 10:46
•
by
Disconnected Printer
(unregistered)
|
No, but I have tried,JavaScript. Using a comma not a period of course. |
Ah, thanks. Why they need such a long string instead of just the date, I don't know. Let's hope it's static ! |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 10:52
•
by
TheDev
(unregistered)
|
But "bureaucracy, bureaucracy, serious fricken bureaucracy" is, which was the point. |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:00
•
by
Zap Brannigan
(unregistered)
|
Don't blame the state, teleconferencing is a WTF. Last several places I worked put them in for many $. Lots of technical problems ect. we gave up and scrapped it. I got large screen TV to take home. |
|
Has anyone ever worked in a union shop? It takes at least 4 groups to move a computer:
Facilities to physically move it. Electrician to plug in the power cable. Network engineer to plug in the network cable. Sysadmin to plug in the mouse and keyboard. |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:01
•
by
Raedwald
|
We have a winner. It pains me how hard it is to fix dysfunctional things when management believes everything is OK. |
|
Ben must have missed one thing. He did not mention Jessica filling out a Form F404:FileCanBeIgonered form before clicking Ignore.. Follow the process Mr.Ben!!
|
|
@SHMUK Yes, it IM be distracting, but I have pidgin configured to
1) open new IM windows on my second monitor 2) when new IM windows are opened or updated don't make them flash in the taskbar 3) turn the notification area icon from red to green when I receive a new message [btw: my notification icons are about 8px square, not 24px square as they are by default] So I ignore IM quite well. I your situation wouldn't require you to run the official client which isn't nearly as configurable... |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:04
•
by
Tommy Tutone
(unregistered)
|
|
Our help desk number is 867-5309. Jenny is really helpful.
|
|
While it's an obvious pain in the tush to have to call someone on the phone who is in the same office, it probably makes some form of bureaucratic sense. The calls might be monitored, recorded, and logged for accounting or other purposes. Having them in a log means that there is an evidentiary trail when something seriously goes wrong.
Otherwise, it becomes a "he said-she said" situation that becomes impossible to adjudicate. It's a system which protects both parties. While a lot of these rules seem stupid and petty, often there's a reason for them. At least that's my guess. |
|
|
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:19
•
by
JimmyVile
(unregistered)
|
|
Double fail, I made a typo, AND I was beaten to it by Tommy Tutone himself!
/damn you Tommy Tutone! //see what I did there |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:23
•
by
Sergej
(unregistered)
|
Amazing! How do you get a job like that?
You wrote a program for this??
I'm not going to ask why your team members need to create random directories because I'm afraid to find out. But why on earth did you have to reinvent a random number generator? |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:26
•
by
Ozz
(unregistered)
|
A\/\/S0m3 DooD! Send me teh c0dez! |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:28
•
by
Code Chutney
(unregistered)
|
|
I cry foul too - how did Jessica call her own phone:
'Jessica picked up her phone and pressed 8, 1, 7, 7, 4, 6, 2, 1, 6. “There, see?”' ...and get someone - maybe Ben didn't check whether there was a ringing tone? Still a funny story tho! |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:28
•
by
Ozz
(unregistered)
|
WOOSH! (Clue: look at who you're quoting...) |
|
How, in that situation, do you not stand up and ask why the hell they're doing that? And if so, why isn't it explained?
|
|
The Real WTF is that Jessica didn't remote into Michael's computer to set up Ben's printer.
|
Wow sounds messy, but most likely very tasty. |
|
This was obviously positioned as a bureaucracy tale but I didn't really feel any excessively onerous and pervasive bureaucracy at work. All I really got from this was that Jessica and co are not inclined to do any work without bloody good reason, and 'bloody good reason' equates to making everyone jump through the traditional corporate hoops to get things signed off (whether it is necessary or not). What I see here is disillusioned staff who want to make everybody's life as miserable as their own. And let's be honest, that is not a WTF - it's common to see in all offices, especially state offices!
|
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:40
•
by
Zap Brannigan
(unregistered)
|
Slightly different topic, have you ever tried to remote into a computer from the same computer? Can't do it with VNC. Once I tried to remote into a computer and from that computer remote back into the first one. I don't remember how that worked out. |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:44
•
by
Trinian
(unregistered)
|
I love it! It's like IT performance art. You sir, are one of the funnier trolls/flamebait that I've seen. |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:49
•
by
anonymous wuss
(unregistered)
|
People frequently complain about the quality of WTFs that are being posted. I have a solution: TopCod3r, please post and explain any code / projects you have written or worked on. Especially the ones you think are clever. For proof that this solution will work, please read quote above. |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:52
•
by
Médinoc
(unregistered)
|
Looks like an UUID |
Re: Serious Fricken Bureaucracy
2008-09-25 11:54
•
by
itzfritz
(unregistered)
|
|
ok, you are a retard because: <drum roll>
1) cd .. 2) cd ..\.. 3) cd ..\..\.. 4) mkdir wqeipjfwvoefi 5) that's not very a good idea. 6) 'system restore' "he gets a big smile and says they are working perfectly"=="nod and smile at the retard" |
| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Next » |